Topic: Air Pollution
Date | Action | Topic | Type | Excerpt | Jurisdiction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-01-19 | New York v. McCarthy | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging EPA failure to act on petition requesting that the agency regulate ozone pollution from sources in upwind states. |
Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2016-10-27 | Connecticut v. Hyundai Motor Co. | Air Pollution, Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Multi-state settlement of consumer-protection claims against car manufacturers that overstated their vehicles’ fuel efficiency. |
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin | |
2016-08-15 | North Dakota v. EPA (methane) | Air Pollution, Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Twelve states joined in defense of EPA’s new source performance standards for methane and VOC emissions from the oil and gas sector. |
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2016-07-07 | Settlement, California v. Volkswagen | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | California AG, working with the federal EPA, entered into two related settlements over Volkswagen’s use of defeat devices to evade emissions testing. |
California | |
2016-06-28 | Settlement with Volkswagen for Emissions Defeat Devices | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Settlement of consumer protection claims raised by a multi-state coalition of state attorneys general against Volkswagen for selling vehicles equipped with “defeat device” software intended to circumvent emissions standards and concealing this software from regulators and the public. |
Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming | |
2015-06-29 | Michigan v. EPA | Air Pollution | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states intervened in lawsuit to defend EPA standards regulating mercury and other air pollutants from the power sector. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2014-12-03 | Coal and Coke Regulations, House Bill 5939 | Air Pollution, Energy | Legislative Input | Illinois AG co-authored legislative proposal to regulate bulk materials storage facilities that handle petroleum coke and other refinery production materials in response to air pollution violations linked to several facilities on Chicago’s southeast side. |
Illinois | |
2014-10-20 | Detroit Waste Incineration Facility Air Pollution Abatement | Air Pollution, Environmental Justice | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Michigan AG brought enforcement action against waste management companies to reduce foul odor emanating from the United States’ largest waste incineration facility. |
Michigan | |
2014-04-29 | EPA v. EME Homer City Generation | Air Pollution | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states intervened in lawsuit to support EPA rule on cross-state air pollution against state and industry challenge. |
Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2013-10-09 | New York State v. McCarthy (2013) | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state suit to compel EPA to review and revise New Source Performance Standards for wood burning devices. |
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2013-06-13 | American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles | Air Pollution | Defense of Local Action | California AG filed an amicus brief in a case involving the Port of Los Angeles “Clean Trucks Program,” which was designed to improve diesel emissions and air quality. |
California | |
2013-02-14 | Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice v. County of Riverside | Air Pollution, Environmental Assessment, Environmental Justice | Lawsuit v. Other Public Entity | California AG intervened in and helped to settle litigation surrounding an industrial project that was expected to increase diesel truck traffic in a predominantly Latino residential area. |
California | |
2012-06-02 | New York v. Jackson | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit to force EPA to comply with Clean Air Act requirement to update and revise National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) every five years. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2009-02-24 | American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the adequacy of EPA’s 2006 revision to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) regulating soot pollution under the Clean Air Act. |
Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2009-02-08 | New Jersey v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to EPA decision to remove fossil fuel-fired power plants from list of sources regulated under CAA section 112 (hazardous air pollutants) and to establish new performance standards for mercury emissions from these plants under CAA section 111. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2007-02-15 | New York v. American Electric Power Service Corp. | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Multi-state litigation under Clean Air Act alleging violations of New Source Review permitting process to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions in coal-fired power plants. |
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2006-03-17 | New York v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to 2002 EPA rule amending and expanding the routine maintenance, repair and replacement exceptions to the New Source Review program. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2005 | New York v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to 2002 EPA rule amending the New Source Review (NSR) program and narrowing the definition of “modification” to exclude certain sources from NSR requirements. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin |