Jurisdiction: New York
Date | Action | Topic | Type | Excerpt | Jurisdiction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-03-31 | New York v. DOE | Climate Change Mitigation, Energy | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the federal government’s decision to delay the effective dates of final rules governing energy efficiency for six products. |
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington | |
2017-01-19 | New York v. McCarthy | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging EPA failure to act on petition requesting that the agency regulate ozone pollution from sources in upwind states. |
Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2016-08-15 | North Dakota v. EPA (methane) | Air Pollution, Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Twelve states joined in defense of EPA’s new source performance standards for methane and VOC emissions from the oil and gas sector. |
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2016-06-28 | Settlement with Volkswagen for Emissions Defeat Devices | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Settlement of consumer protection claims raised by a multi-state coalition of state attorneys general against Volkswagen for selling vehicles equipped with “defeat device” software intended to circumvent emissions standards and concealing this software from regulators and the public. |
Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming | |
2016-06-22 | Congressional Testimony on Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Amendments | Pesticides & Toxics | Legislative Input | Letters and testimony providing recommendations on federal legislation amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to revise the process and requirements for evaluating and determining whether regulatory control of a chemical is warranted. |
California, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2016-05-18 | Green 20 State AG Coalition | Climate Change Mitigation | Other | Group of 17 state AGs and Former Vice President Al Gore announced a coalition of states committed to taking creative steps to combat climate change, including investigations into fossil fuel companies and climate-related disclosures. |
California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, U.S. Virgin Islands, Vermont, Virginia, Washington | |
2015-12-04 | New York ExxonMobil Investigation | Disclosures, Energy | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors, Other | Investigation into whether ExxonMobil’s activities in the climate science sphere constitutes a violation of New York’s Martin Act, which prohibits publicly traded companies from misleading investors. |
New York | |
2015-11-03 | West Virginia v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Multi-state intervention to join EPA’s defense of Clean Power Plan against challenge mounted by other states and industry petitioners. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington | |
2015-10-23 | North Dakota v. EPA (Power Plants) | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states joined as defendant-intervenors in support of EPA in lawsuit challenging New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for carbon dioxide emissions from new and modified power plants. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington | |
2015-08-28 | Murray Energy Corp. v. EPA | Water Pollution | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple sates intervened to support EPA’s defense of the Waters of the U.S. rule. |
Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington | |
2015-06-29 | Michigan v. EPA | Air Pollution | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states intervened in lawsuit to defend EPA standards regulating mercury and other air pollutants from the power sector. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2014-06-23 | Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states intervened in lawsuit to defend EPA rules concerning regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from stationary and mobile sources. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2014-04-29 | EPA v. EME Homer City Generation | Air Pollution | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states intervened in lawsuit to support EPA rule on cross-state air pollution against state and industry challenge. |
Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2014-04-24 | American Public Gas Assoc. v. Department of Energy | Energy | Amicus Brief, Defense of Federal Standards | Multi-state intervention in support of Energy Department proposed rule setting efficiency standards for residential gas furnaces. |
California, Massachusetts, New York | |
2013-10-09 | New York State v. McCarthy (2013) | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state suit to compel EPA to review and revise New Source Performance Standards for wood burning devices. |
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2013-08-08 | Agreement for DOE to Update Energy Efficiency Standards | Climate Change Mitigation, Energy | Administrative Proceeding | Multi-state coalition reached agreement with U.S Department of Energy establishing timetable for updating federal efficiency standards for energy-intensive consumer products. |
Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2013-01-13 | NRDC v. Abraham | Energy | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | States joined NRDC lawsuit challenging the DOE’s attempt to lower energy efficiency standards for certain appliances under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (ECPA). |
California, Connecticut, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Vermont | |
2012-12-11 | Request for Performance Standards and Guidelines for Methane Sources | Climate Change Mitigation | Regulatory petition | Multi-state request for EPA to issue methane standards under the Clean Air Act. |
Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2012-06-08 | New York v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Energy, Environmental Assessment, Solid & Hazardous Waste | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to a Nuclear Regulatory Commission rule on storage of spent nuclear fuel, resulting in a decision that the rule was a major federal action that requires the agency to either make a finding that the action would have no significant environmental action or issue an environmental impact statement. |
Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Vermont | |
2012-06-02 | New York v. Jackson | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit to force EPA to comply with Clean Air Act requirement to update and revise National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) every five years. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2011-06-20 | American Electric Power v. Connecticut | Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Federal common law nuisance claim against five major electric power companies for their contribution to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions. |
California, Connecticut, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, NYC, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2010-06-07 | Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. EPA (2010) | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states moved to intervene in litigation concerning the 2012–2016 light duty motor vehicle emissions standards. |
California, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2009-02-24 | American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the adequacy of EPA’s 2006 revision to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) regulating soot pollution under the Clean Air Act. |
Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2009-02-08 | New Jersey v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to EPA decision to remove fossil fuel-fired power plants from list of sources regulated under CAA section 112 (hazardous air pollutants) and to establish new performance standards for mercury emissions from these plants under CAA section 111. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2008-08-25 | New York v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state action against EPA for failure to set NSPS standards for oil refineries. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2007-12-11 | Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, Inc. v. Goldstene | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of State Rule | State AGs intervened in lawsuit to defend California’s greenhouse gas emission standards for motor vehicles against challenge alleging that the standards are preempted by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). |
California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2007-04-02 | Massachusetts v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to EPA denial of petition to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles under Clean Air Act. |
California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2007-02-15 | New York v. American Electric Power Service Corp. | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Multi-state litigation under Clean Air Act alleging violations of New Source Review permitting process to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions in coal-fired power plants. |
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2006-03-17 | New York v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to 2002 EPA rule amending and expanding the routine maintenance, repair and replacement exceptions to the New Source Review program. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2005-12-06 | New York v. Bodman | Energy | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the Department of Energy (DOE)’s failure to create energy efficiency standards for consumer appliances according to the timeline established by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (ECPA). |
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2005 | New York v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to 2002 EPA rule amending the New Source Review (NSR) program and narrowing the definition of “modification” to exclude certain sources from NSR requirements. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin |