Jurisdiction: California
Date | Action | Topic | Type | Excerpt | Jurisdiction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-04-07 | California AG Freedom of Information Act Request to EPA Head Scott Pruitt | Environmental Ethics | Other | California sent a Freedom of Information Act Request to the EPA for documents related to EPA head Scott Pruitt’s conflicts of interest. |
California | |
2017-03-31 | New York v. DOE | Climate Change Mitigation, Energy | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the federal government’s decision to delay the effective dates of final rules governing energy efficiency for six products. |
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington | |
2017-03-13 | Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | California and Connecticut intervened in lawsuit challenging EPA’s determination to retain existing GHG emission standards for light-duty vehicles. |
California, Connecticut | |
2016-10-27 | Connecticut v. Hyundai Motor Co. | Air Pollution, Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Multi-state settlement of consumer-protection claims against car manufacturers that overstated their vehicles’ fuel efficiency. |
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin | |
2016-10-01 | Amendments to Proposition 65 Regulations | Pesticides & Toxics | Other | California Attorney General amended regulations under Proposition 65, a California disclosure law related to exposure to toxic chemicals. |
California | |
2016-08-15 | North Dakota v. EPA (methane) | Air Pollution, Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Twelve states joined in defense of EPA’s new source performance standards for methane and VOC emissions from the oil and gas sector. |
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2016-07-07 | Settlement, California v. Volkswagen | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | California AG, working with the federal EPA, entered into two related settlements over Volkswagen’s use of defeat devices to evade emissions testing. |
California | |
2016-06-22 | Congressional Testimony on Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Amendments | Pesticides & Toxics | Legislative Input | Letters and testimony providing recommendations on federal legislation amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to revise the process and requirements for evaluating and determining whether regulatory control of a chemical is warranted. |
California, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2016-05-18 | Green 20 State AG Coalition | Climate Change Mitigation | Other | Group of 17 state AGs and Former Vice President Al Gore announced a coalition of states committed to taking creative steps to combat climate change, including investigations into fossil fuel companies and climate-related disclosures. |
California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, U.S. Virgin Islands, Vermont, Virginia, Washington | |
2016-05-17 | Criminal Investigation of the Refugio Oil Spill | Natural Resources, Water Pollution | Criminal Case | Indictment of Plains All American Pipeline on Criminal Charges Resulting from the Refugio Oil Spill |
California | |
2016-04-29 | American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers v. O’Keeffe | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of State Rule | Oregon, California, and Washington joined in defense of Oregon’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard. |
California, Oregon, Washington | |
2015-12-01 | Ventura County and State of California v. Santa Clara Waste Water | Solid & Hazardous Waste | Criminal Case | Joint prosecution between the State of California and the County of Ventura against Santa Clara Waste Water, its parent company, and individual employees for criminal violations stemming from hazardous waste disposal. |
California | |
2015-11-03 | West Virginia v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Multi-state intervention to join EPA’s defense of Clean Power Plan against challenge mounted by other states and industry petitioners. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington | |
2015-10-23 | North Dakota v. EPA (Power Plants) | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states joined as defendant-intervenors in support of EPA in lawsuit challenging New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for carbon dioxide emissions from new and modified power plants. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington | |
2015-06-29 | Michigan v. EPA | Air Pollution | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states intervened in lawsuit to defend EPA standards regulating mercury and other air pollutants from the power sector. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2014-06-23 | Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states intervened in lawsuit to defend EPA rules concerning regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from stationary and mobile sources. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2014-04-24 | American Public Gas Assoc. v. Department of Energy | Energy | Amicus Brief, Defense of Federal Standards | Multi-state intervention in support of Energy Department proposed rule setting efficiency standards for residential gas furnaces. |
California, Massachusetts, New York | |
2013-06-13 | American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles | Air Pollution | Defense of Local Action | California AG filed an amicus brief in a case involving the Port of Los Angeles “Clean Trucks Program,” which was designed to improve diesel emissions and air quality. |
California | |
2013-04-08 | People of the State of California v. Endo Plastics, LLC | Greenwashing | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | California AG brought a lawsuit against three plastic water bottle companies for misleading claims of biodegradability. This was the first “greenwashing” suit of its kind. |
California | |
2013-02-14 | Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice v. County of Riverside | Air Pollution, Environmental Assessment, Environmental Justice | Lawsuit v. Other Public Entity | California AG intervened in and helped to settle litigation surrounding an industrial project that was expected to increase diesel truck traffic in a predominantly Latino residential area. |
California | |
2013-01-13 | NRDC v. Abraham | Energy | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | States joined NRDC lawsuit challenging the DOE’s attempt to lower energy efficiency standards for certain appliances under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (ECPA). |
California, Connecticut, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Vermont | |
2012-06-02 | New York v. Jackson | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit to force EPA to comply with Clean Air Act requirement to update and revise National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) every five years. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2012-01-25 | Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments | Climate Change Mitigation, Environmental Assessment | Lawsuit v. Other Public Entity | California AG intervened in a suit attempting to require the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Regional Transportation Plan to consider climate change in its long term planning decisions. |
California | |
2011-06-20 | American Electric Power v. Connecticut | Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Federal common law nuisance claim against five major electric power companies for their contribution to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions. |
California, Connecticut, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, NYC, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2010-12-15 | California Resource Agency v. United States Department of Agriculture | Natural Resources, Wildlife | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | California sued the U.S. Forest Service for its plan to allow road development through certain wilderness areas in California, including habitats for endangered species. The parties reached a settlement in 2010. |
California | |
2010-12-03 | Golden Gate Audubon Society v. NextEra Wind | Energy, Wildlife | Other | After years of litigation and settlement attempts between environmental and wind turbine industry groups, the California AG’s office stepped in and brokered a settlement to protect migratory birds. |
California | |
2010-06-07 | Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. EPA (2010) | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of Federal Standards | Multiple states moved to intervene in litigation concerning the 2012–2016 light duty motor vehicle emissions standards. |
California, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2009-06-25 | Defense of California Feed-in-Tariff Program | Climate Change Mitigation, Energy | Administrative Proceeding, Defense of State Rule | California AG filed brief with the California Public Utility Commission defending the state’s authority to use feed-in tariffs. |
California | |
2009-02-24 | American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the adequacy of EPA’s 2006 revision to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) regulating soot pollution under the Clean Air Act. |
Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2009-02-08 | New Jersey v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to EPA decision to remove fossil fuel-fired power plants from list of sources regulated under CAA section 112 (hazardous air pollutants) and to establish new performance standards for mercury emissions from these plants under CAA section 111. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2008-08-25 | New York v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state action against EPA for failure to set NSPS standards for oil refineries. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2007-12-11 | Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, Inc. v. Goldstene | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of State Rule | State AGs intervened in lawsuit to defend California’s greenhouse gas emission standards for motor vehicles against challenge alleging that the standards are preempted by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). |
California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2007-08-28 | California v. County of San Bernardino | Climate Change Mitigation, Environmental Assessment | Lawsuit v. Other Public Entity | The State of California entered into a landmark climate change settlement with San Bernardino County setting forth a specific greenhouse gas reduction plan. |
California | |
2007-04-02 | Massachusetts v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to EPA denial of petition to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles under Clean Air Act. |
California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2006-07-03 | Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. | Natural Resources, Solid & Hazardous Waste, Water Pollution | Amicus Brief, Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Washington State intervened and multiple states submitted Amicus Briefs in lawsuit filed by Native American tribe against Canadian smelting company for polluting the Columbia River and Lake Roosevelt. |
Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington | |
2006-03-17 | New York v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to 2002 EPA rule amending and expanding the routine maintenance, repair and replacement exceptions to the New Source Review program. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2005-12-06 | New York v. Bodman | Energy | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the Department of Energy (DOE)’s failure to create energy efficiency standards for consumer appliances according to the timeline established by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (ECPA). |
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2005 | New York v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to 2002 EPA rule amending the New Source Review (NSR) program and narrowing the definition of “modification” to exclude certain sources from NSR requirements. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin |