Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date | Action | Topic | Type | Excerpt | Jurisdiction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016-10-27 | Connecticut v. Hyundai Motor Co. | Air Pollution, Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Multi-state settlement of consumer-protection claims against car manufacturers that overstated their vehicles’ fuel efficiency. |
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin | |
2016-10-21 | New Jersey v. Centennial Land & Development Corp. | Natural Resources | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | New Jersey AG represented New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection in action against developer, holding company for developer, and company’s owner seeking to enforce prior directives to effect repairs and maintenance as required by the Safe Dam Act. |
New Jersey | |
2013-01-13 | NRDC v. Abraham | Energy | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | States joined NRDC lawsuit challenging the DOE’s attempt to lower energy efficiency standards for certain appliances under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (ECPA). |
California, Connecticut, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Vermont | |
2012-06-08 | New York v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Energy, Environmental Assessment, Solid & Hazardous Waste | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to a Nuclear Regulatory Commission rule on storage of spent nuclear fuel, resulting in a decision that the rule was a major federal action that requires the agency to either make a finding that the action would have no significant environmental action or issue an environmental impact statement. |
Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Vermont | |
2011-06-20 | American Electric Power v. Connecticut | Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Federal common law nuisance claim against five major electric power companies for their contribution to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions. |
California, Connecticut, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, NYC, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2011-01-13 | New Jersey, Dept. of Environmental Protection v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Environmental Assessment | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | New Jersey and environmental groups sued the Army Corp. for not supplementing their EIS after an oil spill in the Delaware River. |
New Jersey | |
2010-11-23 | Delaware Dept. of Natural Resources and Environmental Control v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Environmental Assessment, Water Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Delaware and New Jersey brought action pursuant to the APA to challenge a decision made by the US Army Corp of Engineers to proceed with a dredging project to deepen the main navigation channel of the Delaware River without obtaining requisite approval pursuant to the CWA, CAA, CZMA, and Delaware code. |
Delaware, New Jersey | |
2009-02-24 | American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the adequacy of EPA’s 2006 revision to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) regulating soot pollution under the Clean Air Act. |
Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2009-02-08 | New Jersey v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to EPA decision to remove fossil fuel-fired power plants from list of sources regulated under CAA section 112 (hazardous air pollutants) and to establish new performance standards for mercury emissions from these plants under CAA section 111. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2007-12-11 | Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, Inc. v. Goldstene | Climate Change Mitigation | Defense of State Rule | State AGs intervened in lawsuit to defend California’s greenhouse gas emission standards for motor vehicles against challenge alleging that the standards are preempted by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). |
California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2007-04-02 | Massachusetts v. EPA | Climate Change Mitigation | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to EPA denial of petition to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles under Clean Air Act. |
California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington | |
2007-02-15 | New York v. American Electric Power Service Corp. | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Private Actors | Multi-state litigation under Clean Air Act alleging violations of New Source Review permitting process to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions in coal-fired power plants. |
Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont | |
2006-03-17 | New York v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to 2002 EPA rule amending and expanding the routine maintenance, repair and replacement exceptions to the New Source Review program. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2005-12-06 | New York v. Bodman | Energy | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state lawsuit challenging the Department of Energy (DOE)’s failure to create energy efficiency standards for consumer appliances according to the timeline established by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (ECPA). |
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin | |
2005 | New York v. EPA | Air Pollution | Lawsuit vs. Federal Government | Multi-state challenge to 2002 EPA rule amending the New Source Review (NSR) program and narrowing the definition of “modification” to exclude certain sources from NSR requirements. |
California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin |